Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Joonwon | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 2 | WATSON Raymond | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | D V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 3 | ALI Farhan | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 5 | YI Nathan | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 6 | GUMPRICH Joe P. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 7 | YANG Gary | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 8 | CAMPBELL Eva | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 9 | WALLACE George | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 10 | DIMMETT David C. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 11 | EVANS George | D V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 12 | KE Sebastian | V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 13 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | V V V D V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 14 | HERMES Henry | D V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 15 | DELONG Joshua | V V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 16 | ZOOK Evan D. | V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | FEAGIN Patrick | D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 18 | DAVIS Jack | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 19 | MILLSON Daniel | D V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 20 | WANG Marcus | D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 21 | KARNAVAS William | D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 22 | LAPALLO Adam C. | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 23 | HALES Adam | D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 24 | AVILA Heru | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | COX Brian | V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | FISH Bradley | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | KRECK Marie | V D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | SWENSON Jason | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | WATSON Taylor | D D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | HAVERSON Civa | D D D D V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 31 | BANG Dylan | V D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | EDELMAN Catherine | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | MADAR Maximilian | V D D D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 34 | MILLNER Brian | V D D D D D | D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
| 35 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 36 | BARBER Christopher | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 37 | WHEELAND Allison | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 38 | COX Jeniffer | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 38 | LAI Angel | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.