Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Joonwon | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 2 | WATSON Raymond | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 50% | 5% | |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% | |
| 3 | ALI Farhan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 5 | YI Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 17% | 2% |
| 6 | GUMPRICH Joe P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 7 | YANG Gary | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 8 | CAMPBELL Eva | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 9 | WALLACE George | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 10 | DIMMETT David C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 11 | EVANS George | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 12 | KE Sebastian | - | 6% | 31% | 47% | 15% | - | |
| 13 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 14 | HERMES Henry | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 15 | DELONG Joshua | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | ZOOK Evan D. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% | |
| 17 | FEAGIN Patrick | 2% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | DAVIS Jack | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 19 | MILLSON Daniel | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | WANG Marcus | - | 12% | 57% | 28% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | KARNAVAS William | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | LAPALLO Adam C. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | HALES Adam | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 24 | AVILA Heru | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | COX Brian | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 26 | FISH Bradley | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KRECK Marie | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SWENSON Jason | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WATSON Taylor | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | HAVERSON Civa | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | BANG Dylan | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | EDELMAN Catherine | 15% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MADAR Maximilian | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 2% |
| 34 | MILLNER Brian | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 35 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | BARBER Christopher | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | WHEELAND Allison | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | COX Jeniffer | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LAI Angel | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.