Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JANNEY Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | SHANKS Aidan T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | PEZZAT Daniel S. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | PRUT Anton | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 5 | CRAYTON Royce S. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | PRICE Owen | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 6 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | NANAYAKKARA Dinuth | V D V V D | V V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 9 | SHEA William | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 10 | ZIMSKY James | V V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | DAVIS Jack | D V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 12 | SINGH Evangelina | V D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 13 | SHICK Veronika | V V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 14 | WESTGATE Rebecca | D D V V V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 15 | RYAN Sean | D V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | SOLIEV Abbos | V D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | SAE-TUNG Kevin | D D V V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 18 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | V V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | SEMP Brannon A. | D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 20 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | D V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 21 | GUARDIOLA Emily | V D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | TSENG Lucas | D D D V V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 23 | RYGIEL Luke | D V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 25 | EDELMAN Catherine | V V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | SHANKS Jennifer | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | MOORE Annette | D D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | HAVERSON Rana | V V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | LOVELACE Vander | D V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 30 | KARNAVAS William | V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 31 | ROUNTREE Andrew | D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | ZHANG Tingyun (Linda) | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | COX Brian | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | DELEON Alyssia | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 35 | BLEVINS Carolyn | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 36 | ALLEN Lily | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | LEWIS Evan | D D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
| 38 | COX Samuel | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 38 | TRUDEAU Allison | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 40 | COX Jeniffer | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.