Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 2 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | MOLHO Sofia | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 5 | MAK Tinney | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 6 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 6% |
| 7 | JING Emily | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 8 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 30% | 3% |
| 10 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% |
| 11 | CHOI Lenna K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 12 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 13 | LEVI Lea | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 14 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 15 | HUNT Tarleton Q. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 16 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 17 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 18 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 19 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 20 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | KIM Rachael | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 21% | |
| 22 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 24 | RASO Sofia G. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | HE Fenghuan | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 26 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 25% |
| 28 | BREKER Anika | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 29 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 3% | 25% | 45% | 24% | 2% |
| 30 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | HO Brianna W. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | 2% | 11% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 33 | SHAW Kayla M. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | STEWART Isabella A. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 35 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
| 36 | LIN Ashley | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 37 | HE Xiangxin | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% |
| 38 | VEERKAMP Molly | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | MAROTTA Veronica L. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 40 | HUANG NATALIE | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | SADAN Jordan E. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 42 | LEE Alison | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | LI Meilin | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 44 | XU Christine | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 46 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 3% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KEESING Liana | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | WU Irene M. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 50 | YU Jaime L. | 1% | 25% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | PATEL Anika | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 54 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | KIM Lauren | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 2% | 39% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | PO Edith | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | BALCH Julia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | XIE zoey | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | CHEN Jessie S. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 61 | WU Julianna Y. | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | YE Catherine | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 16% | 44% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 64 | DU Hannah | 5% | 36% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | CHEN Georgia M. | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 15% | 43% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | PAVE Claire | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | XU Madison | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | LEE Bethany W. | 9% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | BHAN Zala | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | FELLMAN Sara | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | BASSON Bayley D. | 34% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 73 | SHTROM Uma A. | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | DE LAPEROUSE Nina | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.