Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHOU Stephen C. | V V V D V | V V V V V V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
2 | SHI Andrew | V D D V V | V V V V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
3 | YEN Darren | D V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
3 | QIU Le | D V V V D | V V V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
5 | PEDERSEN Leif | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
6 | RAI Avin | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
7 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
8 | MAHONEY Colin M. | D V V D D V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
9 | WOOD Elden S. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
10 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
12 | LIN John A. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | GINIS Nathan | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
14 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V D D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | D V D V D V | V V V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
16 | LUKASHENKO Darii | V V D D D | V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
17 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
17 | ZU Kevin | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
19 | MIKA Casper | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
20 | BARNETT Adam | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
22 | CHO Brandon | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
23 | CZAHA Balint | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
24 | GANTA Vijay | V V V V V D | V D | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
25 | LILOV Neil | V V D V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
26 | MORRIS Samuel A. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
27 | CHAN Matthew | V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
28 | LAU Jeremy Y. | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
29 | WIND Nicky E. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
30 | SO Hananiah | D D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
31 | LIU kelly | V V V D D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
32 | HONG Marshall Q. | D V V D V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
33 | TRAVERS Samir T. | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
34 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | V V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
35 | WU Nicholas R. | V V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
36 | VACCARI Braden | V D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
37 | WOLIN Zachary A. | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
38 | LASORSA Matthew | V D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | MURTHY mukund | V V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
40 | JUN Ryan | V D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
41 | HARRIS Alex K. | D V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
42 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
43 | HONG Vincent Q. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
44 | METTKE Nathaniel | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
45 | GHOSH Tuhin | D V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
46 | YEN Preston | D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
47 | WYCHE Scott H. | D V V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
48 | WUN William | D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
48 | STEINMETZ John | V V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
50 | KIM Avery J. | V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
50 | ATEFI Daniel | D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
52 | PATTON Colin T. | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
53 | HUSSAIN Faaris | D D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
54 | XU Michael | D V D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
55 | GILLIGAN Wolff | V V D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
56 | TANG Albert | D D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
57 | DEWEY Charles J. | D V V D V D | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
58 | KEEFE Duncan | D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
59 | YUAN Kevin | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
60 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
61 | MORREALE John | V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
62 | LEE Jude H. | D D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
63 | QIN Alexander | V D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
64 | JIANG Kevin | V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
65 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | V D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
66 | LEVIN Mark A. | V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
67 | YOU Jaden | V D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
68 | CHAN Daniel | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
69 | CLAWSON Amzie | V V D D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
70 | MENSAH Kennedy C | D V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
71 | MARTINEZ Justin | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
72 | HUDDY Brandon J. | D V D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
73 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | V D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
73 | ANGELILLO Nicholas | D D D V D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
75 | RYAN Edward T. | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
76 | BUCCINO George | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
77 | WEHLE Paul | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
78 | FAN ANDREW | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
79 | NEVILLE James | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
79 | GROTH Christian | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
81 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
82 | BOURGHOL Matthew | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
83 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | D D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
84 | CHAN Alexander S. | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
85 | PEARSON James G. | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
86 | ZHANG Jeffrey | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
87 | KREGER Evan | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
88 | MOLINARO Lawrence | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
89 | CHAN Austin | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
90 | FISK Ethan | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
91 | SHAO Peter | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
92 | YANG Richard | D D D D D D | D | 3.7 | 0 | -3.7 |
93 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
94 | HO Kaden M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
95 | ZHOU Miles | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
96 | DEFORD Kevin W. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
96 | BELEV Nicholas | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
98 | HUANG Ethan F. | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
99 | CAMPO Alexander P. | D D D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.