East Coast Challenge RJCC

Junior Men's Saber

Saturday, May 11, 2019 at 3:00 PM

Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHOU Stephen C. - - 6% 31% 44% 18%
2 SHI Andrew - - 4% 19% 43% 33%
3 YEN Darren - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 32%
3 QIU Le 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
5 PEDERSEN Leif - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
6 RAI Avin - 1% 5% 19% 36% 31% 9%
7 KUSHKOV Simon O. - - - 5% 21% 42% 32%
8 MAHONEY Colin M. - 3% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
9 WOOD Elden S. - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
10 BASALYGA Jeffrey - 2% 9% 25% 35% 23% 5%
11 FRISHMAN Ethan J. - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
12 LIN John A. - - 3% 23% 46% 27%
13 GINIS Nathan - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
14 MOSKOWITZ Mason C. - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
15 TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 29%
16 LUKASHENKO Darii - 1% 10% 36% 40% 14%
17 WILLIAMS Nolan E. - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
17 ZU Kevin - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
19 MIKA Casper - - - 3% 20% 47% 31%
20 BARNETT Adam - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
21 MOSZCZYNSKI Adam - 1% 7% 21% 35% 28% 9%
22 CHO Brandon - 1% 10% 36% 40% 13%
23 CZAHA Balint - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
24 GANTA Vijay 10% 30% 34% 19% 5% 1% -
25 LILOV Neil - - - 3% 22% 47% 28%
26 MORRIS Samuel A. - 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 7%
27 CHAN Matthew - - 3% 21% 45% 31%
28 LAU Jeremy Y. - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
29 WIND Nicky E. - 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
30 SO Hananiah - 1% 9% 35% 41% 14%
31 LIU kelly - 4% 26% 43% 23% 4%
32 HONG Marshall Q. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
33 TRAVERS Samir T. - 3% 15% 36% 35% 11%
34 SZEWCZYK Thomas D. - 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
35 WU Nicholas R. 1% 9% 26% 34% 23% 7% 1%
36 VACCARI Braden 1% 5% 19% 32% 29% 13% 2%
37 WOLIN Zachary A. - 1% 6% 24% 38% 26% 6%
38 LASORSA Matthew 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 9% 1%
39 MURTHY mukund - 2% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
40 JUN Ryan 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
41 HARRIS Alex K. - 1% 6% 24% 42% 23% 4%
42 BARTOLO Domenic V. - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
43 HONG Vincent Q. 7% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
44 METTKE Nathaniel 2% 13% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
45 GHOSH Tuhin 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2%
46 YEN Preston 1% 9% 31% 38% 18% 3%
47 WYCHE Scott H. 7% 31% 44% 16% 2% -
48 WUN William 1% 8% 28% 38% 21% 4%
48 STEINMETZ John 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% -
50 KIM Avery J. - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
50 ATEFI Daniel 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
52 PATTON Colin T. 1% 17% 47% 28% 6% -
53 HUSSAIN Faaris - 1% 6% 20% 34% 29% 10%
54 XU Michael 10% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1% -
55 GILLIGAN Wolff - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
56 TANG Albert 1% 8% 23% 33% 24% 9% 1%
57 DEWEY Charles J. 26% 51% 20% 3% - - -
58 KEEFE Duncan 3% 16% 34% 33% 13% 2%
59 YUAN Kevin 5% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1%
60 PARKHURST Jr Michael 2% 16% 38% 32% 11% 1%
61 MORREALE John - 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
62 LEE Jude H. 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
63 QIN Alexander 10% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1% -
64 JIANG Kevin 31% 46% 20% 3% - -
65 EPSTEIN Henry N. 9% 33% 36% 17% 4% - -
66 LEVIN Mark A. 1% 5% 20% 36% 29% 9%
67 YOU Jaden 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
68 CHAN Daniel 2% 14% 35% 35% 12% 1% -
69 CLAWSON Amzie - 2% 10% 25% 34% 23% 6%
70 MENSAH Kennedy C 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
71 MARTINEZ Justin 12% 37% 36% 13% 2% - -
72 HUDDY Brandon J. 1% 5% 19% 32% 29% 13% 2%
73 ALKEMPER Tristan H. 1% 10% 27% 33% 21% 7% 1%
73 ANGELILLO Nicholas 18% 49% 26% 6% 1% - -
75 RYAN Edward T. 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
76 BUCCINO George 10% 52% 31% 6% - -
77 WEHLE Paul 25% 41% 26% 8% 1% -
78 FAN ANDREW 15% 46% 30% 8% 1% -
79 NEVILLE James 30% 49% 18% 2% - -
79 GROTH Christian 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
81 TEVEBAUGH Andrew 17% 37% 31% 13% 3% -
82 BOURGHOL Matthew 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% - -
83 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. - 2% 13% 32% 34% 17% 3%
84 CHAN Alexander S. 6% 23% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
85 PEARSON James G. 28% 43% 23% 5% - - -
86 ZHANG Jeffrey - 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
87 KREGER Evan 13% 33% 33% 17% 4% - -
88 MOLINARO Lawrence 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
89 CHAN Austin 47% 43% 9% 1% - - -
90 FISK Ethan 52% 36% 10% 1% - - -
91 SHAO Peter 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
92 YANG Richard < 1% 2% 11% 28% 35% 19% 4%
93 CHERNAEV Aleksandar 10% 34% 36% 16% 3% -
94 HO Kaden M. 8% 28% 35% 21% 7% 1% -
95 ZHOU Miles 7% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
96 DEFORD Kevin W. 76% 23% 1% - - -
96 BELEV Nicholas 26% 49% 22% 3% - -
98 HUANG Ethan F. < 1% 5% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2%
99 CAMPO Alexander P. 54% 39% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.