Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 52% |
| 2 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 29% | |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 5 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 6 | JING Emily | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 7 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 52% | 21% |
| 8 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 9 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 11 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 12 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 13 | XU Christine | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | HO Brianna W. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 15 | HE Xiangxin | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 16 | LUNG Katerina | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
| 17 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 18 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 19 | ZHANG Alina C. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 20 | XIE zoey | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | NARANG Maya | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 6% | |
| 24 | HE Fenghuan | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 25 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | LI Meilin | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 29 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 30 | WANG Ellen | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 31 | XU Madison | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 33 | YE Eileen | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 34 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 35 | BASSON Bayley D. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SHAW Kayla M. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 37 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | DU Hannah | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 41 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 42 | FELLUS Talia E. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 4% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | YU Jaime L. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SHTROM Uma A. | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | BHAN Zala | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | WU Julianna Y. | 19% | 46% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | HUANG NATALIE | 4% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | PAVE Claire | 42% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | KANIUK Rachel | 26% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | SU Michelle | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 45% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | YU Lauren C. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CLOWES Madison | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | MEYER Claudia | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | YANG Megan | 13% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | CHARALEL Jessica | 31% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.