Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% |
| 2 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 3 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 5 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
| 6 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 7 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 21% |
| 8 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 9 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 11 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 12 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 13 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 14 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 15 | HE Xiangxin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 16 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 17 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 18 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 19 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 20 | XIE zoey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 21 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | NARANG Maya | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 6% | |
| 24 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 25 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 28 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 30 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 31 | XU Madison | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 33 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
| 34 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 35 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 37 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | DU Hannah | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 41 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | 3% | - |
| 42 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 100% | 96% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | KANIUK Rachel | 100% | 74% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | SU Michelle | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 53 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CLOWES Madison | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | YANG Megan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 69% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.