Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
2 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
3 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
3 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 48% | 18% |
5 | MEGGERS Davin | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% | |
6 | ANAFI Ari | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
7 | TATE William Isom | - | - | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
8 | MARTINEZ Joshua | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 32% | 6% |
9 | MUMMIDI Rishi | - | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 36% | |
10 | DOLBOW Trevor | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | < 1% | - | |
11 | SOKALSKI Edwin | 3% | 31% | 45% | 19% | 2% | - | |
12 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
13 | KARASICK Andrew | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
14 | WU Shaochi | - | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
15 | MAGUIRE Timothy | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
16 | STEVENS Daniel L. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
17 | FLINT James E. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
18 | MURPHY Megan | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - | |
19 | ADAMS Gregory S. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
20 | WOOD William A. | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | JARRATT Isaac | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
22 | O'REILLY Robert | 3% | 25% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
23 | WHITTINGTON Kelly | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
24 | SANTOS Ronald (Ron) T. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | CREAN Allison | 5% | 60% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
26 | BEACHY Megan | 59% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.