Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
2 | WANG Carol | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
3 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
3 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
5 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% |
6 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% |
7 | CAO Amelie | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | ||
8 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
9 | HUANG Sophie | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
10 | JOO Sara | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 40% | 34% | 2% |
11 | WANG DINA C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
12 | CHUNG Stella | 2% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 4% | ||
13 | ZHU Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
14 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
15 | DOUGLAS Addison | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
16 | CHOI Cara | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
17 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
18 | BO Iris | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 22% |
19 | SFINTESCU Emma | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
20 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% | - |
21 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
22 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
23 | POLING Katherine | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
24 | CHO Olivia | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 1% |
25 | HEMPHILL Mia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | LIN Yunong | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
27 | PELLE Lia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
28 | MANGLANI Maya | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
29 | FAN Melody | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
30 | SHUTZER Lily | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
31 | COLE Sofia | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
33 | YIN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
34 | BAULIN Zoya | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
35 | ZHANG Caroline | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
36 | HOU Xu | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
37 | MULLER Amara | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | BENNETT Emi | 5% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 2% | ||
39 | GOODMAN Carden | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
40 | STEWART Isla | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
41 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
42 | REILLY Carys | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
43 | GENG Emma | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
44 | YOUM Amelia | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
46 | LIN Claire | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | YANG Hanli | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
48 | PARK Emily | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
49 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 6% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
50 | LEO Jenna | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
51 | BALIN Sophia | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
52 | PAEK Mila | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
53 | KIRBY Emelie | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
54 | WAN Celine | 1% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 8% | ||
55 | SHANG Arianna | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
56 | GOMEZ Sofia | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
57 | WU Charlotte | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | SHI Micah | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | HAFEZ Sahar | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | - |
60 | DINAR Julia | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | HUANG Gabrielle | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
62 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
63 | LIANG Jasmine | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
64 | LU Miaotian | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
65 | ZELDIN Nina | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | ||
66 | JUVVADI Aanika | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
67 | KENT Evelyn | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
68 | ELOY Jasmine | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.