Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Anson | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 2 | YANG Charles | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 43% | 9% |
| 3 | FEDELI Francesco | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 5 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 6 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 46% |
| 7 | YU Eric | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 8 | MARISI Gabriel | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 25% |
| 9 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 10 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 11 | LI Lucas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 12 | PARKER Isaiah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 13 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 50% |
| 14 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
| 15 | MA Oliver | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | SHIN Noah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% |
| 17 | ONG Nicholas | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 18 | NUCKLES Caden | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 20 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 21 | LEE Jaden | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 22 | CHENG Mason | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 49% | 19% |
| 24 | FUKUDA Brando | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 25 | PARK Andrew | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 26 | SU Desmond | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 28 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 29 | LEE Abin | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | TIMBOL Elijah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 31 | JIN Xueyuan George | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Parker | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | LATORRE Leonardo | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 21% | 3% |
| 34 | CAO Joshua | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 35 | PE Noah | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 36 | YANG Tate | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | POPOKH Luca | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | LO Ernest | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | YANG Steve | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | LEE Christopher | 1% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SLAIN Owen | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | SONG HAN GYEOL | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
| 43 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 44 | GUO Austin | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | WEI Winston | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 46 | HONG Edwin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 5% |
| 47 | KIM Daniel | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 48 | LEE Junehyuk | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LIU Alex | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 51 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 52 | MURDOCK Koichi | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | RAU Shogun | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | HE Ian | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 55 | RYU GREYSON | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LI Aaron | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 58 | KWONG Colin | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | KUBBA Krish | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | YE Jerry | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 61 | GOGOI Kavi | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ZENG Albert | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | CHEN Owen | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LUKASIK Michael | 54% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | HUYNH Kaleb | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 66 | ZHANG Yankai | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 67 | OH Christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 68 | TAN Alan | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | XU Ethan | - | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 70 | HO Cameron | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | CHIANG Aiden | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | CHAU Ivan | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | QIAN Henry | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 74 | LIN Conrad | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LEONG Samuel | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | MAZAHERI John | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 77 | LIN Evan | 26% | 46% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 78 | ALVAREZ Sebastian | 3% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | DIMINO Kartik | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | ZHENG Lerui | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 81 | MOON Nicolas | 22% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 82 | LAM Kirin | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | CHUNG Royce | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | ESQUIVEL-RODRIGUEZ Tristan | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | LIN Alden | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | LIU Runze | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 87 | HWANG Alexander | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | QIU Yiran | 51% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | TEOH Liam | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | JUE Lucas | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | SUKKALA Avaneesh | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | ZHU Yiming | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | BHANGOO Arman | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 94 | LIU Matthew | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 95 | FIERRO GARCIA Adriel | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 96 | LIU Aiden | 13% | 41% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | SCHAMP Eliot | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.