Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JOHNSON Eli | - | 8% | 52% | 33% | 6% | - | < 1% |
2 | BIESIADA Sophia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
3 | WINTERGERST Maxwell | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 38% | 5% | |
3 | LAGUNA Genevieve | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
5 | DEPP Edward | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
6 | BOWKER Yeteva | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
8 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% | |
10 | GUMP Natalie | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
11 | TURNER Jackson | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
12 | GUMP Catherine | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
13 | STEWART Maxton | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
14 | HAWS Clara | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
15 | WHITE Benjamin | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 9% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.