John J. Moore Athletics and Fitness Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAN Kevin | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% | |
| 2 | SIU Max | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
| 3 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 5 | ZHANG Ethan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 6 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 7 | KIAYIAS Alexander | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 8 | SONG Enoch | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 9 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 33% | 5% |
| 10 | HU Michael | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 11 | CAO Aaron | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 12 | LIU jeremy | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 13 | MONDESIR Chace | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 14 | CHOI Hunter | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 15 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 16 | TIAN Dylan | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | DENG Jonathan | - | 6% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 18 | RICHMAN Aaron | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | SHAW Eric | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 2% | |
| 20 | HUANG Dalynn | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 21 | LEE Kyle | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | CHAO ABU MINGZE | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | JIANG Ethan | 5% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | MACKENZIE Dylan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | LIN Ziyue | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 26 | BRADY David | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 27 | TIAN Andy | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | WU Connor | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 30 | CHONG Cooper | 11% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | CHEN Kevin | 7% | 36% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | GENG Vincent | 3% | 26% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | DEVISETTY Sohun | - | - | 2% | 24% | 63% | 10% | |
| 35 | RAY Callum | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | NAYAK Saideep | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | CUI Hanwen | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | ELAGROUDY Ali | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | SNYDER Winston | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% | |
| 40 | WANG Grant | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MACK Julian | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | MARTINSON Finn | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZHANG Vincent | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.