Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 2 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 13% | 48% | 38% | |
| 3 | KETTELLE John | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 41% |
| 3 | CHENG Logan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 49% | 35% | |
| 5 | KIM Brian | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 6 | PARKER Isaiah | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 34% | |
| 7 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 39% | |
| 8 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
| 9 | OROPEZA David | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 10 | ONG Nicholas | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
| 11 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
| 12 | ZHENG Marcus | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 13 | CHEN Anson | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
| 14 | RAJ Jay | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 15 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 28% | |
| 16 | LI Lucas | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 17 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | OH Christopher | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 20 | UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | YANG Charles | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 11% |
| 22 | PE Noah | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | HONG Edwin | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | PARK Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | SLAIN Owen | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | CLARK Benjamin | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
| 28 | WEI Winston | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | YU Eric | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | QU Zhida (richard) | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 32 | LEE Christopher | 1% | 13% | 45% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BIELER Mason | - | - | 3% | 18% | 48% | 31% | |
| 34 | LEE Jaden | - | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% |
| 35 | CHEN Kelton | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | LATORRE Leonardo | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | YE Jerry | - | 4% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | CHIANG Aiden | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | POPOKH Luca | 3% | 21% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | LAM Kirin | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | LEONG Samuel | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | - | 2% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 44 | HUYNH Matthew | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | WARMERDAM Joseph | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | MARISI Gabriel | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 47 | GAFFORD Roman | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | SANCHEZ Martin | 4% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIN Evan | 30% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ALVAREZ Sebastian | 19% | 45% | 29% | 7% | - | - | |
| 51 | LEE Junehyuk | 4% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | FRANCIS Maximillian | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | COHEN Nathan | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | CHEN Owen | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 11% | 37% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | SEMLER Benjamin | 15% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HE Ian | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | FERNANDEZ Rumi | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | LUKASIK Michael | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | CHENG Mason | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 61 | LEE Abin | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | FRANCIS Sebastian | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | GOGOI Kavi | 24% | 50% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | ALI Adam | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | DAR Omri | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | SCHAMP Eliot | 78% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.