Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 2 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 5 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 5 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
| 7 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 8 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 9 | ZHANG Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 10 | DING Max | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 11 | LIU Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 11 | SHIM Jae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 11 | KIM Doyun | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 15 | ALI Rayan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
| 16 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 17 | ZHANG jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 23% | |
| 18 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 19 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 20 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 21 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 22 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 23 | KIM Leejay | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 24 | GEVA Reuben | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 25 | QU RuiTing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 26 | BELETSKII Ivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 27 | KICIMAN Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 28 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | CHIANG William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | CHOI SIWON | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | YU Brandon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | CHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 34 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 36 | LEE Leo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 37 | HANTOV Adrian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 38 | RODRIGUEZ Emiliano | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 39 | ZHAN ETHAN | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 41 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 42 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 43 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 44 | LI Andy | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 45 | FRENCH Drake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 46 | CHEN Linus | 100% | 97% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | RUAN Yichen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 48 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | YUE Bryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 52 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 53 | SKORUPA Alexander | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 55 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 56 | DISPENZA Jayan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | ISMAILOV Alan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 58 | CHAU Ivan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | JIMENEZ PARRA Dorian D | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | YOON Ian | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | HOLDEN Harrison | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | GOLDBERG Simon | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | SHIM Jaeyoo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 66 | PARK Sihoon | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 68 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 69 | LI Vance | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 70 | DESAI Adithya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 71 | XIONG Alec | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 72 | LIN Edison | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 73 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 74 | LI Stephen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 75 | QU ethan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 76 | KEPLER Kyle | 100% | 95% | 66% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 77 | DE LOS REYES Noah | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | MIDDLETON Matthew | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 79 | DUCHNOWSKI Thiesson | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | YANG Gavin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 81 | LOURIE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 82 | GUO zhaohong | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | CHI Zachary | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | JU Shang | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | KHALID Ilyas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 86 | FAYEZ Adam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 87 | TAN Samuel | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 88 | YAKUB Noah | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 88 | HOHMAN Elias | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 90 | ROULLARD Atticus | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 91 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 92 | THOMSON Piers | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 93 | MONTGOMERY Jaxon | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.