Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KIM Shawn J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
2 | DINU Nicholas D. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
3 | LIANG Connor | D V V V D | V V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
3 | SOHN Kevin J. | D D V D D V | V V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
5 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
6 | BREIER Satchel E. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
7 | KANG Brandon M. | V V D D D D | V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
8 | JEFFORDS Alexander | D D D D V | V V V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
9 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
10 | YANG Kevin S. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
11 | WINKLER Lucas G. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
12 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
13 | REESE Aaron S. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
14 | BAILEY Asher | V V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
15 | LIMB Matthew G. | V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
16 | KIM Benjamin H. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
17 | LIMAYE Dhruv | V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
18 | FRIAS SAUL F. | V V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | COPELAND Oliver E. | V D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
20 | DHINGRA Gian K. | D V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
21 | KOUNALAKIS Evangelos T. | V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
22 | KIM Andrew H. | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
23 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | D V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
24 | BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P. | V V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
25 | SINGER Carson | V D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
26 | DAVIS Alexander N. | V D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
27 | LI Joshua L. | V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
28 | YANG Ziyi | D D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
29 | BERGER Oliver | D D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
30 | LIU David J. | D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
31 | NOBLE Daniel | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
32 | RUNDLETT Jakob C. | D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
33 | SWORDS Evan F. | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
34 | CHANG Colin S. | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
35 | REINSCH-GOLDSTEIN Alexander N. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
36 | TRINH Trevor Z. | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
37 | CHANG Nigel | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
38 | GAO Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
39 | VO Minh Q. | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
40 | MOLINARI Luke M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.