Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Shawn J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 2 | DINU Nicholas D. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 3 | LIANG Connor | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | SOHN Kevin J. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 5 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 6 | BREIER Satchel E. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 7 | KANG Brandon M. | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 32% | 4% | - |
| 8 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 10 | YANG Kevin S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 11 | WINKLER Lucas G. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 12 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 13 | REESE Aaron S. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 14 | BAILEY Asher | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 15 | LIMB Matthew G. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin H. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 17 | LIMAYE Dhruv | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% | |
| 18 | FRIAS SAUL F. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 19 | COPELAND Oliver E. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 20 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | KOUNALAKIS Evangelos T. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% | |
| 22 | KIM Andrew H. | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | SINGER Carson | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 26 | DAVIS Alexander N. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | LI Joshua L. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | YANG Ziyi | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | BERGER Oliver | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | LIU David J. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | NOBLE Daniel | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | RUNDLETT Jakob C. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 33 | SWORDS Evan F. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | CHANG Colin S. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | REINSCH-GOLDSTEIN Alexander N. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | TRINH Trevor Z. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | CHANG Nigel | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | GAO Ethan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | VO Minh Q. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | MOLINARI Luke M. | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.