Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GUFFEY Christopher | V V V D V D | V V V V V V V | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
2 | KWALWASSER Eric | V V D D V | V V V V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
3 | KIM Ethan | V V D V D V | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
3 | WANG ANDREW CHANG | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
5 | YAN William | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
6 | HUANG Alex F. | D D V D V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
7 | LEE Aidan | D D V V D | V V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
8 | PATEL Rayn | D V D D V | V V V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
9 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
10 | TAO Jeffrey | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
11 | YE Eric | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
12 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | V V D V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
13 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | SOWERS Samuel | D V V D V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
15 | OH Aster | D V V D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
16 | TSE Aiden J | D D V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
17 | YANG Dylan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
18 | WANG Jerry | V V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
19 | SO Preston | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
20 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
21 | MUNGUIA Nathan | V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
22 | GAY Jono | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
22 | LIN Maxim | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
24 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | KATZ Ryan | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
26 | HU Chris | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
27 | LIN Philip T. | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
28 | CHEN Samuel | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
29 | NGO Maximus | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
30 | YANG Phillip | V D D D V | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
31 | MALAITHONG Nathagorn | V D D D D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
32 | PINTO Marcus | D D D V D | V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
33 | KUSHKOV Daniel | V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
34 | STURGEON Cole | V V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
35 | WANG Daniel | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
36 | KANG Evan | V V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
37 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | V V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
38 | LI Howard | D V V V V V | D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
39 | CHON Collin | V V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
40 | SUBA Lucas | D V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
41 | KIM ELIJAH | V V V V D V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
42 | ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) | V V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
43 | JOO Jeein | V V D V V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
44 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | V V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
45 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | V D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
46 | WANG Samuel | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
47 | GONZALEZ Jake | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
48 | MATTOO Deven | V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
49 | LINCOURT Arthur | D V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
50 | KANG Evan R. | V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
51 | ZHAO Lucas | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
52 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
53 | WANG Max | V D V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
54 | CHUNG Connor | V D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
55 | WANG Justin | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
56 | SU Landon | D V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
57 | CLARK Aram | D V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
58 | ATWOOD Griffin | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
58 | LIU Kevin | D V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
60 | ANDRES Michael | V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
61 | LIU Yijin | V V D D D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
62 | ZHOU William | D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
63 | GONG Alex | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
64 | WONG Lucas | D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
65 | PRIEUR Christian F. | D V V V V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
66 | CHAMBERS Miles | V V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
67 | PRIMUS Nazir | V V V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
68 | LEE Noah | V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
69 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | V D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
70 | GONG Gavin | V V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
71 | GREMILLION Obadiah | V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
72 | YOOK Isaac | V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
73 | KANG Matthew | V D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
74 | HWANG Jayden | V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
75 | KIM Kendrick | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
76 | SUGIURA Samuel | V D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
77 | MEHAN Nicholas | V V V D D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
78 | ZHENG LEON | V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
79 | ZHAO Royce | D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
80 | NG Jonathan | V D V D D V | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
80 | WANG Michael | V V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
82 | EYBELMAN Ariel | V D D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
83 | DAI Zihou | V D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
84 | BADUSHOV Anton | V D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
85 | CHENHE YuHan | D V D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
86 | SANGSTER Arden | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
87 | LIN Felix | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
88 | TSAO Oliver | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
89 | LI Ayden | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
90 | AUTREY Adrien | D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
91 | CAO Oliver | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
92 | SHANKWILER Christopher | D D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
93 | WEI Rian | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
94 | LI Matthew | D D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
95 | KALPATHY Rohit | D V V D D D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
96 | UEMOTO Ken | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
97 | CAO Donald | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
98 | LEE William Nigel | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
99 | ZENG Vito | D D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
100 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | D V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
101 | KU Collin | V V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
102 | FANG Eason | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
103 | SUN Andrew | V D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
104 | GONG Jerry | D V D D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
105 | LIU Andrew | V D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
106 | SADHU Neiyam | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
106 | RAMANAN Govind | D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
108 | SASSI Ilyas | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
109 | LEE Andrew | D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
110 | BROWN Andrew | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
111 | LI Yidong A. | D V D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
112 | LIM Brandon | D D D V D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
113 | PEREIRA Beckham | D D D D D V | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
114 | LEE Brady | D V D D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
115 | VO Landon | D D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
116 | HUA Michael | D D D D V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
116 | KAVZAN Toprak | D D D D D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
118 | CHEN Jonathan | D D D D D V | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
119 | HU Harry | D D V D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
120 | PAK Andrew | D D D V D D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
121 | XU Ivan | D D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
122 | CAI Jeff | D D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
123 | WANG Max | D D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
124 | SEELMAN Cole | D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
125 | SALMAN Hamzah | D D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
126 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
126 | NGO Emerson | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
128 | CHAN Elliott | D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
129 | LIAO Yifong | D D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
129 | MATTOO Dhruv | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
131 | TSAO Alister | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.