Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUFFEY Christopher | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
| 2 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
| 3 | KIM Ethan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | WANG ANDREW CHANG | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 5 | YAN William | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 6 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 7 | LEE Aidan | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 5% | |
| 8 | PATEL Rayn | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 9 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 10 | TAO Jeffrey | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 11 | YE Eric | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 12 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 13 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 14 | SOWERS Samuel | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | OH Aster | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | TSE Aiden J | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 17 | YANG Dylan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 18 | WANG Jerry | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | < 1% |
| 19 | SO Preston | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 20 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 21 | MUNGUIA Nathan | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | ||
| 22 | GAY Jono | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LIN Maxim | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 24 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
| 24 | KATZ Ryan | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | HU Chris | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 27 | LIN Philip T. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | CHEN Samuel | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | NGO Maximus | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | YANG Phillip | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | MALAITHONG Nathagorn | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% | |
| 32 | PINTO Marcus | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 34 | STURGEON Cole | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | < 1% |
| 35 | WANG Daniel | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 36 | KANG Evan | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 37 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | LI Howard | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 39% |
| 39 | CHON Collin | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 40 | SUBA Lucas | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 41 | KIM ELIJAH | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 42 | ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | JOO Jeein | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 44 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 45 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 46 | WANG Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 47 | GONZALEZ Jake | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
| 48 | MATTOO Deven | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
| 49 | LINCOURT Arthur | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | KANG Evan R. | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | ||
| 51 | ZHAO Lucas | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 52 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 53 | WANG Max | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 54 | CHUNG Connor | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 55 | WANG Justin | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 56 | SU Landon | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 57 | CLARK Aram | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | ATWOOD Griffin | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | LIU Kevin | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 60 | ANDRES Michael | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 61 | LIU Yijin | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | ZHOU William | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | GONG Alex | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 64 | WONG Lucas | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 65 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 66 | CHAMBERS Miles | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
| 68 | LEE Noah | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 69 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 70 | GONG Gavin | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 71 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | |
| 72 | YOOK Isaac | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 73 | KANG Matthew | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 74 | HWANG Jayden | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 75 | KIM Kendrick | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 76 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 77 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 78 | ZHENG LEON | 3% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 4% | ||
| 79 | ZHAO Royce | 9% | 39% | 38% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 80 | NG Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 80 | WANG Michael | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 82 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 83 | DAI Zihou | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | BADUSHOV Anton | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | CHENHE YuHan | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 86 | SANGSTER Arden | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 87 | LIN Felix | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 88 | TSAO Oliver | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 89 | LI Ayden | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 90 | AUTREY Adrien | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | CAO Oliver | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 92 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 93 | WEI Rian | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 94 | LI Matthew | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 95 | KALPATHY Rohit | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 96 | UEMOTO Ken | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 97 | CAO Donald | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 98 | LEE William Nigel | 2% | 11% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 8% | 1% |
| 99 | ZENG Vito | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 100 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 101 | KU Collin | 39% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 102 | FANG Eason | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 103 | SUN Andrew | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 104 | GONG Jerry | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 105 | LIU Andrew | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | SADHU Neiyam | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 106 | RAMANAN Govind | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 108 | SASSI Ilyas | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 109 | LEE Andrew | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 110 | BROWN Andrew | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 111 | LI Yidong A. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 112 | LIM Brandon | 7% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 113 | PEREIRA Beckham | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 114 | LEE Brady | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 115 | VO Landon | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | HUA Michael | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 116 | KAVZAN Toprak | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | CHEN Jonathan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 119 | HU Harry | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 120 | PAK Andrew | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 121 | XU Ivan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 122 | CAI Jeff | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 123 | WANG Max | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 124 | SEELMAN Cole | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | ||
| 125 | SALMAN Hamzah | 8% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 126 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 126 | NGO Emerson | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | CHAN Elliott | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 129 | LIAO Yifong | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 129 | MATTOO Dhruv | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 131 | TSAO Alister | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.