Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | 1% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 7% |
2 | TANG Julian | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% | |
3 | WOOD Alexander W. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
3 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
5 | FADL Omar | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% |
6 | JAN Stephen | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
7 | CHO Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 49% |
8 | JUNCO Carlos | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
9 | MILLER Douglas S. | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 42% | 13% |
10 | TOMASI John | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
11 | FLANAGAN James | - | - | 10% | 38% | 40% | 12% | |
12 | KREIDMAN Michael J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% |
13 | BALESTRACCI CHRIS | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
14 | VALENTINE Iain | - | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 6% |
15 | GREEN Michael C. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
16 | ZHANG Jie | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
17 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
18 | POPOKH Leo | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 19% | |
18 | WU Jingxiao | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - | |
20 | JALBERT Jean-Francois | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
21 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
22 | MAURIN Michael | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
23 | ZHAO Zhiyong | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 4% |
24 | FROST Talon | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | KURCHIN Yury | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
26 | RIFFATERRE Jason | 17% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
27 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | - | - | 7% | 33% | 44% | 17% | |
28 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - | |
29 | BANKS Alex S. | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 43% | 13% |
30 | GONZALEZ Eric J. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
31 | GARDNER William | 2% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
32 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
33 | DENMAN Matthew L. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
34 | CARTER Tony | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
35 | JOHANSON David B. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
36 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 15% | 52% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | SUAREZ Rolando | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
38 | NEWELL Tim | 15% | 44% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - |
39 | LESNIAK Chuck | - | 4% | 31% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
40 | BHATT Jay | 1% | 13% | 49% | 30% | 6% | - | |
41 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
42 | YOO Terry S. | 23% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
43 | WOOD BEn | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% | |
44 | WU Clarence C. | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
45 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | 2% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
46 | KRAUSS John W. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
46 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
48 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 1% | 11% | 45% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | ZEISS Gary M. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
50 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
51 | HOLCOMB Michael | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
52 | JOO Michael | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
53 | MCCONKEY Eric | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - | |
54 | SCHNEIDERMAN todd | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
55 | CHAN Geoffrey | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
56 | STOY Patrick | 12% | 41% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
57 | DUANE Michael | 5% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | RYAN Sean | 1% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
59 | FRASER Justin | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
60 | ORNELAS Polo | 25% | 58% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | DRESSEL DONALD | 43% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
62 | FELDMAN Louis | 37% | 45% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | HILL David E. | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
65 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 4% | 36% | 51% | 8% | - | - | - |
66 | WILLIAMS Brian | 61% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
67 | MAZAHERI Bernie | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.