Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 2 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 31% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
| 5 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 6 | THURGOOD Madison C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 7 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 8 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 9 | BOTELLO Natalia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 10 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 12% |
| 12 | MELNYCHUK Yelyzaveta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 13 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% |
| 14 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 16 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
| 18 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 60% |
| 19 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
| 20 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 21 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 25% |
| 22 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 23 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 24 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
| 24 | LAURI Keira | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 26 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 27 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 28 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 29 | ELBAKRY jana | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 31 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 32 | WANG yining | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 34 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 8% |
| 35 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 36 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 36 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 39 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% | |
| 40 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 41 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 42 | DANTULURI Shalini | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 44 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 44 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | YANG Lea | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 48 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 50 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 51 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 10% | |
| 52 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 53 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 53 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 55 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 56 | WANG Elysia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 57 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 58 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 59 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 60 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 61 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 62 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 63 | BROWN Emma | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% | 2% | |
| 64 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 65 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 66 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 67 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 68 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% | 1% |
| 69 | SHI Julia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 70 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 71 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 23% |
| 72 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 73 | LIU Zhi Jun | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 75 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 75 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 78 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 78 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 81 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 82 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 83 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 84 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | DONG Angel | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 87 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 5% | |
| 88 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
| 89 | TANG Zhifei | 100% | 91% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 90 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% | 1% |
| 91 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 92 | YUCEL Emine I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 93 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 94 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 95 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 96 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 96 | WANG Callie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 98 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 99 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 100 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 101 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 102 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 102 | XIONG Haojiao | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 104 | CHUNG Hailey | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 105 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 106 | FAN Alexandria | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | WALLER London | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 108 | HUANG Doris | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 109 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 110 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 111 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 112 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 113 | HU Anna | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 114 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 115 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 116 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 117 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 118 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 118 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 120 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 121 | YU Holly | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 122 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 124 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 125 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 125 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 127 | OCA Merci | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 128 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 129 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 130 | WONG Natalie | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 131 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 132 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 133 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 6% |
| 133 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 133 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 133 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 138 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 138 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 140 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 140 | KIM Satie | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 142 | CASTELO Soleil | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 143 | CONG Anne | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 144 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 145 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 146 | LIU kai yin aria | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 147 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 148 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 149 | YAM Danika | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 150 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 150 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 152 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 153 | VENTURA Eva | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 154 | AWAD Royce | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 155 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 156 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 157 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 158 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 159 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 160 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 160 | LI Sonia | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 162 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 163 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 164 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 165 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 165 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 167 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 167 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 169 | CREUSOT Julia D. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 170 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 170 | XIE Nora | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 172 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 172 | HSU Leah | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 174 | WHELAN Brynn M. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 175 | LUKER Hannah | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 176 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 177 | GAY Sasha | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 178 | KANG Ellie | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 179 | LEE Alyson | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 180 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 181 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 182 | ZUO Xiaofan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 183 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 184 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.