Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUVEG Bela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 2 | AMELI Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 3 | VARNEY John R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 3 | FRANK Fred | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 5 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 7 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
| 8 | TREANOR Donald K. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 9 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 10 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 12 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
| 13 | NIXON Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 14 | DEPOMMIER Remi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 15 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 18 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 20 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 22 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | GLENNON Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 25 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | WILSON Victor T. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 28 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | STONE Ken | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 30 | WHITELOCK James R. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | BAXTER David | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 33 | KANE Tim | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | POOLE James M. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | HVIDING Ketil | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GLASNAPP Mark | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | PIERRO Roger | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PESTANA Juan | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.