Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUVEG Bela | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 2 | AMELI Sean | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | VARNEY John R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 3 | FRANK Fred | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 5 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 7 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 8 | TREANOR Donald K. | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 9 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 10 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | WAGMAN Robert S. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 13 | NIXON Mark | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 14 | DEPOMMIER Remi | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 15 | PERKA Michael | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 16 | LIPTON Michael D. | - | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | EVANS Allen L. | - | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 18 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 20 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 6% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | WILLIAMS Richard | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | GLENNON Michael | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 24 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 25 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 26 | WILSON Victor T. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | SWANSON Dave | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | STONE Ken | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 30 | WHITELOCK James R. | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | BAXTER David | - | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 32 | HUGHES Michael D. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | KANE Tim | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 34 | POOLE James M. | 20% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BECK Brian C. | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | HVIDING Ketil | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GLASNAPP Mark | 4% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | PIERRO Roger | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PESTANA Juan | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | LONADIER Robert | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.