Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | - | 2% | 29% | 68% |
| 2 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 3 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | |
| 5 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 5% | 30% | 45% | 20% | |
| 6 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 7 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 1% | 14% | 52% | 33% | |
| 8 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 46% | 44% | |
| 10 | MATOS Lívia | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 59% | 17% |
| 11 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 12 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
| 13 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 14 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 14 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 3% | 25% | 46% | 26% | |
| 16 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 17 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | 6% | 33% | 44% | 17% | |
| 18 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | WANG Jasmine | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 20 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 21 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 2% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | ORVANANOS ANICE | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 23 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 25 | BASSIK Eva | - | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | LEE Lavender | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 27 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 5% | 30% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 10% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 29 | QIAN Zhiyan | 4% | 33% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | NORTH Zoe M. | 1% | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 4% | 27% | 51% | 16% | 1% | |
| 32 | CHARALEL Jessica | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Kaitlyn | 52% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 16% | 50% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | MEI Sarah | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | SMITH Emilee E. | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | - | - | |
| 37 | HSIEH Rebecca | 4% | 34% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | DATLA Meha | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | HSIEH Sabrina | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZULUETA Catherine | 3% | 32% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 10% | 50% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | NORDQUIST Britt Marie | 55% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | ZHANG Ania | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | KOKE Kristen | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.