Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 2 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 3 | LO Ernest | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 5 | DOUGLASS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 6 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 7 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 8 | LI Austin | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 9 | ALCAZAREN Cian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 10 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 6% | |
| 11 | MAO Runxian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 12 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | |
| 12 | XIE Yimo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 14 | PARK Avan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 15 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | BHANOT Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 18 | HO Cameron | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 19 | JUE Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HE Gary | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 22 | GUO Joey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% | |
| 23 | ARCARA Evan | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | JUNG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 25 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 26 | LI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | CHOI Andrew | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WU Thomas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 29 | KIM Parker | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
| 31 | CHETWANI naman | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | DANIEL Nikith | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 33 | CHEN Ryker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 34 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 35 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | SHU Eric | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
| 37 | SHENOY sean | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | DING Sam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 41 | LI Jake | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | MASOOD Rohail | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | YUEN Landon | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | MENENDEZ Roberto | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | SCHAMP Eliot | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | WONG Connor | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | SHANNON Matthew | 100% | 69% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | BHANGOO Arman | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | VIZCARRA Nathan | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.