Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
2 | SHOMAN Noah | V V D V D | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
3 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
3 | REN James | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
5 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | OH Triton | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
7 | ZENG Noah | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
8 | WU Richard | V D D V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
9 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
10 | HU Christopher | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
11 | LEE Aydan J. | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
12 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | BERA Enzo | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | GAUVEY Kieran | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
15 | DOWNEY Baran | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | CLARK Gabriel | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
17 | TURCK Caspar J. | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | DUCKETT Myles | V V V V D V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
19 | ZHANG Derek | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
20 | ANAND Rohan | V V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
21 | MAHAPATRA SAMARTH | D D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
22 | CHEN Jia Tao | V D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
23 | VAUGHN Jason | D D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
24 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
25 | SU Landon | D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
26 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
27 | YEE Ethan C. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | LIN Philip T. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
29 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | V D D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
30 | PEREIRA Beckham | D V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
31 | WANG Max | D V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
32 | OH Aster | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
33 | BENNETT Anthony | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | SONG Tony | D D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
35 | BAKALOV Alex | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
36 | HILL Spencer | D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
37 | PREUD'HOMME Guillaume | D V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
38 | GUREVICH Savely | D V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
39 | YAN William | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
40 | PATEL Rayn | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
41 | SAPIR Alex | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
42 | NORTON Benjamin | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
43 | GARDNER Sebastian | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
44 | SUN Andy | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
45 | AKST Elliot | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
46 | LARRAZOLO Evan | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
47 | FEI Danny | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
48 | HAPP Braeden | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
49 | HOTHA Nikhil | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
50 | KIRCHMAIER Charlie | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
51 | GREENBAUM Max B. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
52 | GUREVICH Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
53 | LEE Thomas | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.