Wayne State University Matthaei Building - Detroit, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | |
| 3 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% |
| 3 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 5 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 6 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 7 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 8 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 1% | |
| 9 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
| 10 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 11 | COPELAND Nigel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 13 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 14 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 7% |
| 15 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 17 | LEE Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | CHOI JULIE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 18 | DUPIN Shana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 21 | NAZARIO Dominic | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 24 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 86% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 25 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 26 | HARRIS Parker | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 22% | - | |
| 28 | LU Alex | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 29 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | HUNTER Phillip | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | XIONG Isabel | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | LAKAS Darius | 100% | 79% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | STONE Sydney | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | PERRIN Emma | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 1% | |
| 37 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | VARRE Rishi | 100% | 87% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | MICK Gabriel | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 42 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | DIRKES Catherine | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | THEKKEL Jonathan | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | SCOTT Fredric | 100% | 85% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.