Macalester Field House - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
2 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
3 | TAN Xinlai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
4 | GARSKE James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 5% |
5 | NAIDL Josiah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 59% | ||
6 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% | |
7 | LINEBERRY Caden | 100% | 97% | 71% | 14% | < 1% | |
8 | MENASCO Juliun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
9 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 10% |
10 | RUBY Asher | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
11 | MARTIN Wesley | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
12 | GLOVER George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
13 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 92% | 52% | 8% | ||
14 | BERSCHEID Arthur | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | ||
15 | ZINSER Jamie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | |
16 | HASHMI Mushaf | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 4% | |
17 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | |
18 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 9% | |
19 | DING Zilin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | 3% |
20 | FEEHAN Conor | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | < 1% | - |
21 | NEELIMANDHU Sahil | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | AHNEMANN Leif | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% |
23 | HOKANSON Braddock | 100% | 80% | 33% | 3% | - | |
24 | JARCHO Beckett | 100% | 99% | 79% | 23% | ||
25 | ZHANG Alexander | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | 2% | - |
26 | PETERSON Quinn | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - |
27 | BURCHILL Carter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 47% | |
28 | MOGENSEN Ezra | 100% | 49% | 9% | - | ||
29 | HUANG Kai | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
30 | BASTODKAR Ved | 100% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | IBARRA Alejandro | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 4% | |
32 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 1% | |
33 | CAPERS Hunter | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
34 | POLYZOIS Alkis | 100% | 60% | 16% | 1% | - | |
35 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 85% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
36 | YANG Haopeng | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
37 | BELL Andrew | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
37 | CHRISTENSEN Jack | 100% | 87% | 43% | 7% | ||
39 | FANG Ethan | 100% | 82% | 36% | 6% | - | |
41 | ANDERSON Norse | 100% | 94% | 64% | 19% | 1% | |
42 | KRUEGER Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 2% |
43 | FERRARA Asher | 100% | 96% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - |
44 | BEDARD Bennett | 100% | 86% | 37% | 6% | - | |
45 | UNGLAUB Maxwell | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | |
46 | ROY Griffin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - |
47 | BAUER Elijah | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 7% | |
48 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 89% | 28% | 2% | ||
49 | SUNDSBAK Evan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
50 | WANG Allan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 28% |
51 | CRUZ Cole | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
53 | BOMGARDNER Ben | 100% | 24% | 1% | - | ||
54 | BALDERES Gavin | 100% | 85% | 37% | 6% | - | |
55 | PEICHEL Joshua | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
56 | BERCHENKO Zachary | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
57 | CASEY Liam | 100% | 79% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
57 | WINTERS Linus | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
59 | ZERR Daemin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
60 | AHRENS Declan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 9% | - |
62 | ENGLERT Brayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
64 | KOTCH Brodie | 100% | 89% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | SKIBELL Cyrus | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | |
66 | THOMAS Asher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 22% | 2% |
67 | FREEMAN Julian | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 7% | |
68 | CARDIN Harvey | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
70 | LIMKE Sean | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
71 | PERRY Eli | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | |
73 | WEED Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
74 | BUTLER Aurelius | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.