Macalester Field House - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 2 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% | |
| 3 | TAN Xinlai | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 80% |
| 4 | GARSKE James | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 37% | 5% |
| 5 | NAIDL Josiah | - | 4% | 37% | 59% | ||
| 6 | TOEWS Jackson | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
| 7 | LINEBERRY Caden | 3% | 26% | 57% | 13% | < 1% | |
| 8 | MENASCO Juliun | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 9 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | - | - | 4% | 27% | 59% | 10% |
| 10 | RUBY Asher | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 11 | MARTIN Wesley | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | GLOVER George | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 13 | DIFRANK Tae | 8% | 40% | 44% | 8% | ||
| 14 | BERSCHEID Arthur | - | 6% | 35% | 58% | ||
| 15 | ZINSER Jamie | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
| 16 | HASHMI Mushaf | 2% | 18% | 43% | 32% | 4% | |
| 17 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 18 | DRAWZ Chase | - | 7% | 34% | 49% | 9% | |
| 19 | DING Zilin | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 37% | 3% |
| 20 | FEEHAN Conor | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | < 1% | - |
| 21 | NEELIMANDHU Sahil | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | AHNEMANN Leif | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | HOKANSON Braddock | 20% | 47% | 29% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | JARCHO Beckett | 1% | 20% | 56% | 23% | ||
| 25 | ZHANG Alexander | 5% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 26 | PETERSON Quinn | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | BURCHILL Carter | - | - | 3% | 50% | 47% | |
| 28 | MOGENSEN Ezra | 51% | 40% | 9% | - | ||
| 29 | HUANG Kai | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | BASTODKAR Ved | 14% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | IBARRA Alejandro | 2% | 17% | 44% | 33% | 4% | |
| 32 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 33 | CAPERS Hunter | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 34 | POLYZOIS Alkis | 40% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | YATES Graeme | 15% | 47% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
| 36 | YANG Haopeng | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 37 | BELL Andrew | 11% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 37 | CHRISTENSEN Jack | 13% | 44% | 36% | 7% | ||
| 39 | FANG Ethan | 18% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | ANDERSON Norse | 6% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 1% | |
| 42 | KRUEGER Benjamin | - | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 43 | FERRARA Asher | 4% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 44 | BEDARD Bennett | 14% | 49% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | UNGLAUB Maxwell | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | ROY Griffin | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BAUER Elijah | 1% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 7% | |
| 48 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 11% | 61% | 26% | 2% | ||
| 49 | SUNDSBAK Evan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | WANG Allan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 28% |
| 51 | CRUZ Cole | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | BOMGARDNER Ben | 76% | 22% | 1% | - | ||
| 54 | BALDERES Gavin | 15% | 48% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | PEICHEL Joshua | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | |
| 56 | BERCHENKO Zachary | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 57 | CASEY Liam | 21% | 49% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | WINTERS Linus | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | ZERR Daemin | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
| 60 | AHRENS Declan | 1% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 62 | ENGLERT Brayden | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 64 | KOTCH Brodie | 11% | 44% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SKIBELL Cyrus | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | THOMAS Asher | - | 2% | 18% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 67 | FREEMAN Julian | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% | |
| 68 | CARDIN Harvey | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | LIMKE Sean | 1% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
| 71 | PERRY Eli | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 73 | WEED Matthew | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 74 | BUTLER Aurelius | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.