Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 2 | FENG Kelly L. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 3 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 5 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 6 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 7 | MAO Amy | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 8 | SCHUPPE Sharon A. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
| 9 | KANDEL Margaret C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 10 | SMIK Leonie A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 11 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 12 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 14 | PILLSBURY Jessie J. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | LEE Calla | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | BONDAR Nika | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | WEISS Olivia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | GERARDIN Marie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 19 | ALLEN Susan B. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | GROENING Joanne | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 21 | JI Catherine | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 22 | RUSSELL Renata | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 23 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 24 | DILAWRI Anika | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | WOLF Lisa A. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
| 26 | PARDO Sarah | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 28 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 30 | MARONEY Gianna | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | BOWIE Charlotta | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | ROWLAND May | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 34 | RUSSELL Alison | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | BYRON Karen J. | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 38 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 39 | OAKE Erica | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | CAREY Michele S. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 41 | COMES Rita | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | LI Tiffany | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | RADICH Lori G. | 7% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | PRICE Makalyn W. | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | BRAGG Kathleen E. | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | WILLIAMS Stephanie | 44% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | FASSETT Siobhan | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.