Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | FENG Kelly L. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | D V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 7 | MAO Amy | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | SCHUPPE Sharon A. | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | KANDEL Margaret C. | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 10 | SMIK Leonie A. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 12 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | V V V D D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 13 | PEHLIVANI Zara | D D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | PILLSBURY Jessie J. | D D V V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 15 | LEE Calla | V D D V D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 16 | BONDAR Nika | D D V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | WEISS Olivia | V V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | GERARDIN Marie | V V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 19 | ALLEN Susan B. | V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | GROENING Joanne | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | JI Catherine | V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 22 | RUSSELL Renata | D V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 23 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 24 | DILAWRI Anika | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 25 | WOLF Lisa A. | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | PARDO Sarah | V D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 27 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 28 | PRIMES Amanda M. | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 30 | MARONEY Gianna | D V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | BOWIE Charlotta | V D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | ROWLAND May | D D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | D V D V V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 34 | RUSSELL Alison | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | V V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 36 | BYRON Karen J. | V D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 37 | BOWEN Victoria M. | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 38 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 39 | OAKE Erica | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 40 | CAREY Michele S. | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 41 | COMES Rita | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 42 | LI Tiffany | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 43 | RADICH Lori G. | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | PRICE Makalyn W. | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 45 | BRAGG Kathleen E. | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 46 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 47 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | INAMDAR Nina S. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 49 | WILLIAMS Stephanie | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 50 | WILKENS Patricia A. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 51 | FASSETT Siobhan | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.