Nittany Valley Sports Centre - State College, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE JoonWon | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | SVERDLOV Seth | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | BOUDREAUX James | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 5 | JIN Owen | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | KARIMOV Amir | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | CHEN Brian | V V D V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 9 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 10 | TU Jinqi | V V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 11 | HU Robert J. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | XIAO Yichen | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | CHEN Jun Ho | V D V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | CHEN Allen | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | ZHANG Michael | D V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 17 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 18 | ZHANG ethan | V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | YU Samuel | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | WANG Kaiyan | V V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | CHEMEZOV Trent | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 22 | CHO Alex | V D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | LEE Henry | D V D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | RADENOVIC Vukan | V D V D V D | V D | 5.5 | 3 | -2.5 |
| 25 | HULL Liam | D V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 26 | RIM Eugene | D D V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | ZHANG James | D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 28 | YIN Chujun | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | SO Lorenzo | D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 30 | CHEN YiHeng | D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | AGROMAYOR Benjamin | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | CHEN Jayden | D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 33 | DUKO Phillip | V V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | WANG Marcus | V D V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 35 | CAMP Ethan | V V V D D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 36 | HU Anton | D V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | RAKOTOZAFY Adrian | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 38 | HENNESSY Levon | D D D V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 39 | LEHNER Brian | D V D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 40 | LEE DoWon | V D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 41 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 42 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 43 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 44 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 45 | HE Lingyun Matthew | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 46 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 47 | SHIN Sangjune | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 48 | FENG Du | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | MANITT Philip | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | MCDONNELL Nathaniel | D D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 51 | VERWORN Jonathan | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 52 | SHONEMAN Sam | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 53 | BENUCCI Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.