Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WELLER Teddy | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | QUAN Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | RABINKOV Anthony | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 5 | ESCUETA Tony V. | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | BAILEY Asher | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | LI Joshua L. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 8 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 9 | PORTMANN Stein J. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 10 | RAJA Arnav | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | WESLER Logan A. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | LASORSA Matthew | V D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 13 | DESAI Drewv D. | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | DOARES Andrew | D V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 15 | ROBERTS Sam | V V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 16 | YOUNG Brendon | D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 17 | TANG Brendan J. | D V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 18 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 19 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | CHEONG Heonjae | D V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | BERMAN Luca | D D V V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | BARLOW Christopher | V D V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 24 | XU William | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | FAN Wengronghao | V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | NGUYEN Andrew | D D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | KORINTH Alexander J. | D D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | MADRID Derek | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | HENSHAW Joseph | V D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | LEUNG Nathan | D D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 32 | POSTMA Jacob | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 34 | KANDLIK Aaron K. | V V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 35 | STONE Christopher A. | D D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 36 | SUN David | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 37 | LU Evan | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 39 | TIERNO Thomas J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | POSTMA Sean | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | ACKER Alan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.