Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WELLER Teddy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 2 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | QUAN Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | RABINKOV Anthony | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 5 | ESCUETA Tony V. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 5 | BAILEY Asher | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 7 | LI Joshua L. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 9 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 10 | RAJA Arnav | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 11 | WESLER Logan A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 12 | LASORSA Matthew | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | DESAI Drewv D. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 14 | DOARES Andrew | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 15 | ROBERTS Sam | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | YOUNG Brendon | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | TANG Brendan J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 18 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 19 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 21 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | BERMAN Luca | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | BARLOW Christopher | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 24 | XU William | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | FAN Wengronghao | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 26 | NGUYEN Andrew | 5% | 29% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | MADRID Derek | 12% | 48% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | HENSHAW Joseph | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 30 | LEUNG Nathan | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | POSTMA Jacob | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | KANDLIK Aaron K. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 35 | STONE Christopher A. | 3% | 22% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SUN David | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | LU Evan | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | POSTMA Sean | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | ACKER Alan | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.