Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AMELI Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 3 | MOREAU John A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 3 | RANES Evan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 5 | RICHARDS Dick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 6 | VARNEY John R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 7 | SEGAL Mark N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 8 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | - |
| 9 | ALEXANDER Chuck | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 10 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
| 11 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 12 | GLASS Timothy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 13 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | HENZLER Thomas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
| 15 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | SMITH Herman E. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | WALLACE Patric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 18 | SCOTT George R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 20 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 22 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | KING Charles M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | BAER Bryan G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 2% |
| 25 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 27 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | MASE James B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | LIMA Roberto M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
| 30 | HENDRICKS Ron | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 32 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 33 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | NEALE James H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | RESS Michael A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 38 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 39 | ABELE Chris | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | TKACH Robert W. | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | SNYDER John W. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 94% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 44 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | HERMAN Ronald J. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SCHULZ Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 48 | HVIDING Ketil | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | MYERS Brent M. | 100% | 82% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LOGAN Mark P. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | WHITE Chance N. | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.