Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LICHTEN Keith H. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 2 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 3 | DIAZ HERNANDEZ Yasmany E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 5 | FOSTER Kyle P. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 6 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 7 | MARSH Timothy G. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 8 | FOLEY Kevin | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 7% | |
| 9 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 10 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 1% | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 11 | PHO Eric | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 12 | BARREIRO Darren | - | 8% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | POPPER Luca G. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% | |
| 14 | YAO Shun | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LEE David S. | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 16 | CHENG Thomas | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 17 | GERSEN Jacob | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | HARRIS Robert S. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | JOHNSON Shane | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 20 | RHEA Eric L. | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 21 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | RABIEH Ra'ad (Rod) | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | ARTUZ Robert | 6% | 45% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | KIM Jeff | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.