December NAC

Vet-50 Men's Épée

Friday, December 6, 2019 at 12:00 PM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.2 6 +0.8
2 NORMILE Jon M. D V V D V V V V V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
3 WATRALL Rick V D V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
3 JOHNSON Jeff V D V V V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
5 REES Daniel I. V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
6 POULIQUEN Benoit (Ben) V V V V V D V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
7 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. V V D D V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
8 GILLHAM Timothy A. V D D V V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
9 NIXON Mark V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
10 WILSON Jeffrey M. V V V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
11 JELEV Mario I. V V V V V D V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
12 LOEFFLER Carl E. V V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
13 PERKA Michael V D D V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
14 HAYENGA Gary M. V V D V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
15 DAVIS Andrew D D V D V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
16 BECK Brian C. V D D D D V V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
17 SUMLER Jeffery V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
18 MEHALL Michael V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
19 MECHKOV Iliya V D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
20 LANG Markus V V V V V D V D 4.6 5 +0.4
21 AMRINE JR Terry L. V V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 DESAMOURS Georges H. D V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
23 TRAIN Timothy D. V V V D V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
24 JENSEN David D D V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
25 GUMAGAY Paul D V V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
26 FLY Paul D D V V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
27 GREENBAUM Isaac D V V V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
28 SUVEG Bela D D V V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
29 FRANK Fred D V V D D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
30 LUONG Allen V V V D D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
31 SWANSON Dave D V V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
32 KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) V V D D D D V D 2.0 2 -
33 MAZZOLI Julio C. V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
34 DIDASKALOU Ilias L. V V V V D V D 4.5 5 +0.5
35 KISSINGFORD John F. V V D V V D D 4.4 4 -0.4
36 HERGERT Earl D D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
37 STEWART Robert D V D V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
38 MAYCHROWITZ Matt V V D V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
39 KAUFMAN Joel H. V D V D V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
40 SAYLOR David A. D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
41 WHITESIDES Scott M. D V V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
42 NEMAZIE David A. V D D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
43 PARTE Aidan D V D V D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
44 LEE Richard U. V D D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
45 LIPTON Michael D. V D D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
46 DEUCHER Joseph H. V D V D D D D 5.1 2 -3.1
47 BALESTRACCI Chris V D D D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
48 WHITE Derrek W. D V V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
49 NGUYEN Cuong T. D V D V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
50 OCHS Bradley C. V D D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
51 TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
52 KANE Tim V V D D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
53 ROOD Alex D D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
54 BRUS Brian V. D V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
55 RIFKIND Neil D D D D V V D 0.5 2 +1.5
56 KUHN Jeffrey D V D V D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
57 BARAFF David V D D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
58 CLINEFELTER Dennis S. D D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
59 ROZANSKI Sr. Ed A. D D V D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
60 BAXTER Daniel J. V D D D D D V D 3.7 1 -2.7
61 POPPRE Michael N. D D D D V D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
62 JONES John (Mike) M. D D D D D V V D 1.5 1 -0.5
63 KLINE R. Jay D D V D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
63 PEISTRUP Gregory (Greg) L. D D D D V D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
65 KOERBER Christopher T. D D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
66 WHITE Phillip J. D D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
67 WILLIAMS Richard D D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
68 SOLETI Giovanni D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
69 SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
70 ROGERS John D. D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.