Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
2 | WU Jessica | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
3 | BUSH emma | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | MENDOZA zoie | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
5 | MAI Mailan | - | - | 9% | 36% | 42% | 13% | |
6 | ELSTON Sophia | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
7 | ENRILE Erica | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
8 | JAMES Ashley | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
9 | KANE Chloe | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 5% |
10 | ROBLES Claudia | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
11 | RASHID Summer | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
12 | GUESNARD Maelig | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
13 | WANG Victoria | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
14 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
15 | BLANCO Ariia | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
16 | WANG Angelina | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
17 | BROWN Riley | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
18 | KAUR Jaap | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
19 | HERD Angela | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
20 | JAQUISH Zoey | 1% | 16% | 48% | 28% | 6% | - | |
21 | KROTZ Gemma | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
22 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
23 | CHEONG Chloe | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
24 | BLAETZ Isadora | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | GAGARING Genia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | MANDAP Alessandra | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
27 | SCANLAN Claire | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 38% | 10% | |
28 | ZHAO Yanning | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
29 | GRAZIANO Ruby Mae | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | LU Chloe | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
32 | LI Chloe | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
33 | LEE Adelynn | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
34 | SHETTY Nandita | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | MOHEBI Neeka | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
36 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 20% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
37 | RAPTIS Layla | 17% | 55% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | HASIM Eurietta | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
39 | SUN Zhanwen | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
40 | MOORE Christiahn | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | UEMURA Lyllia | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | PAK Ella | 64% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
43 | LUCENA Yaretzi | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | CHAE Avery | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.