Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Joey | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 2 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 3 | HIGGINS Branford | - | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 75% |
| 3 | WU Johnny y. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
| 5 | SHIN Ryan | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 6 | AVETISIAN Alexander | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 7 | DENISON Declan | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 8 | LIU Yikun | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 9 | FERRIERE Joshua | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 10 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 11 | LEE Royce | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
| 12 | KIM Alexander | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
| 13 | POSSON Luke | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 14 | VOO Lucas | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | LI zerong | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | COLLINS Kaden | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | BERTEL Florian | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 18 | HINTON Evan | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 19 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 20 | RUFANOV Maxim | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 22 | CHARETTE Matt | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 23 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | DENG haoyu | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | HAMILTON Travis | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | CAMP Ryder | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | TRACY James | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 28 | WANG Kyle | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | GRAHAM Jacob | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | KIM Tristan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | STAFFORD Bryan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | LIANG Donny | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | PAINTER Noah | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | CHANG Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 35 | RONG Gordon | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 36 | MA Ciel | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | RAHMAN Zayd | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MCCULLOUGH Kevin | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | DENG Destin | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | WOOLCOCK Cash | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHEONG Cameron | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 42 | MENG Haoyi | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | WOO Lucas | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 45 | NIKIFOROV Timofei | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 46 | AVETISIAN Michael | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | FU Adrian | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | LEE Damien | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 49 | KLINKNER Richard | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 51 | CHARETTE Alex | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | SCHERZAY Ian | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 53 | RAHMAN Ali | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | KOU Mason | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | MAXU Tiger | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 56 | GADHVI Darius | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | DAVIDOVICH Eli | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | PALMARES Xavier | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | WONG Vansen | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | JAMES Kaden | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | NIE Shuobo | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.