Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
1 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | ||||||
2 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |||||||
3 | HURLEY Kelley A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | ||||||
3 | WASHINGTON Isis | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |||||||
5 | BASSA Francesca A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | ||||||
6 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |||||||
7 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% | ||||||
8 | GUO ZI SHAN | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 15% | 26% | 28% | 17% | 4% |
9 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 2% | ||||||
10 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | ||||||
11 | KOPECKY Lydia J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | ||||||
12 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 12% | 22% | 26% | 21% | 10% | 3% | - |
13 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | ||||||
14 | MARTINEZ HANSEN Dayana C. | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3% | 10% | 21% | 29% | 24% | 11% | 2% |
15 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 38% | 5% | |||||||
16 | CHOI Lyla | - | 1% | 4% | 13% | 23% | 26% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
17 | BATES Cassandra L. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | ||||||
18 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | ||||||
19 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 15% | 24% | 26% | 17% | 7% | 2% | - | |
20 | PAPADOPOULOS Maria | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 21% | 27% | 22% | 11% | 3% | - | |
21 | STEWART Tatijana I. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |||||||
22 | KHROL Jaclyn | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |||||||
23 | GARINA Ania (Ganusia) | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 25% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | |
24 | PARK Faith K. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |||||||
25 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 19% | 27% | 24% | 13% | 4% | - |
26 | VIE Natalie J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | ||||||
27 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 19% | 27% | 25% | 13% | 3% |
28 | YEFREMENKO Dariya (Dasha) | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 17% | 26% | 26% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
29 | SIRICO Amanda E. | - | 2% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 8% | ||||||
30 | RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 19% | 27% | 24% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | ||
31 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 15% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 8% | 2% | - | - |
32 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | ||||||
33 | VERMEULE Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% | ||||||
34 | PLENTY Kenyata (Kenya) (Kenya) G. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
35 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 27% | 25% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | |
36 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 25% | 21% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | |
37 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 18% | 28% | 28% | 14% | 3% |
38 | MO Victoria | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% | ||||||
39 | KUNJAN Lena R. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | ||||||
39 | CHRETIEN PAULINE | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 27% | 26% | 14% | 4% | - |
41 | LEE Sumin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% | ||||||
42 | SMIK Leonie A. | 1% | 6% | 16% | 25% | 24% | 16% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | |
43 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 20% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - |
44 | BENNING Friederike | - | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 17% | 26% | 25% | 16% | 5% | 1% | |
45 | CEBULA Anne | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% | ||||||
46 | KOMAR Sofia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% | ||||||
47 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 17% | 24% | 23% | 15% | 7% | 2% | - |
48 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 1% | 5% | 14% | 23% | 26% | 19% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
49 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 17% | 23% | 22% | 15% | 7% | 2% | 1% | - | - |
50 | KWON Athina | - | 2% | 8% | 19% | 26% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
51 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 26% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
52 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 16% | 26% | 27% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
53 | BRILL Sophie | 1% | 4% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 20% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
54 | WILEY Erica | - | 2% | 8% | 19% | 26% | 24% | 14% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | |
55 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | ||||||
56 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | 1% | 6% | 17% | 26% | 26% | 16% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | |
57 | LURYE Sarah | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |||||||
58 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 21% | 26% | 21% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |
59 | LOMBARD Ella | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
60 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 3% | 10% | 20% | 26% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | CHU Audrey | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | 1% | 7% | 19% | 28% | 25% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
63 | PROCTOR Sara J. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 27% | 25% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | ||
63 | WOLF Isabella A. | - | 1% | 5% | 15% | 24% | 26% | 18% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | |
65 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 19% | 25% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
66 | PROVENZA Hannah G. | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 20% | 11% | 3% | - | |
67 | GAO Aretha R. | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 26% | 25% | 15% | 5% | 1% | - | - | ||
68 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - |
69 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | 4% | 17% | 28% | 27% | 16% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |
70 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | 1% | 8% | 19% | 27% | 24% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
71 | SCHUPPE Sharon A. | - | 2% | 9% | 19% | 26% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | |
72 | LEE Olive | 3% | 13% | 27% | 29% | 19% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |
73 | KETKAR Mallika | 1% | 6% | 16% | 26% | 26% | 17% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | ||
74 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | - | - | 3% | 10% | 21% | 27% | 22% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |
75 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 24% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - |
76 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - |
77 | RUSSELL Renata | 5% | 18% | 28% | 26% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
78 | ISERT Sarah | - | 2% | 9% | 19% | 25% | 22% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
79 | BOURDEAU Emily B. | 1% | 4% | 14% | 24% | 26% | 19% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
80 | CHIMAHUSKY Rebecca | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% | ||||||
81 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 20% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
82 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | - | 2% | 7% | 15% | 23% | 24% | 17% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
83 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
84 | CANDREVA Greta H. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% | ||||||
85 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 25% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | |
86 | KIM Diane E. | - | 1% | 5% | 14% | 23% | 26% | 19% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | MAO Amy | 1% | 5% | 16% | 27% | 26% | 16% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
88 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 1% | 7% | 19% | 28% | 25% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
89 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | 6% | 19% | 30% | 26% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
90 | BUCUR Rebekah O. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 27% | 25% | 14% | 4% | - | |
91 | ASHER Valerie | 1% | 5% | 15% | 25% | 26% | 18% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | - | |
91 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | 1% | 6% | 15% | 25% | 26% | 17% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
93 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | |
94 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 10% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
95 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 16% | ||||||
97 | HEDVAT Alexis S. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |||||||
98 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | ||||||
99 | LANDWEHR Helen B. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | ||||||
100 | TIKHONOVA Julia | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - | ||||||
101 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - | ||||||
102 | FENG Kelly L. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - | ||||||
102 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | ||||||
104 | LUO Ashley | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | ||||||
105 | WEISS Olivia | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - | ||||||
105 | BROOKS Tean R. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | ||||||
107 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
108 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |||||||
109 | MARSH Janet L. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |||||||
110 | GORDET Cristina G. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |||||||
111 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |||||||
112 | BOOY Tamara L. | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |||||||
113 | NI Emma | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |||||||
114 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | ||||||
115 | WEISS Talia L. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - | ||||||
116 | HUZEL Lisa | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | ||||||
117 | BOWIE Charlotta | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
118 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - | ||||||
119 | BRISK Angelica A. | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
119 | ALLEN Susan B. | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
121 | ZHANG Maya | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | ||||||
122 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
123 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | ||||||
124 | PILLSBURY Jessie J. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
125 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - | ||||||
126 | RICH Caroline B. | 43% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.