Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FU BRANDEN | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 2 | QI Zach | V V D V V | V V V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 3 | CHUNG Evan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | LVOVSKIY Roman | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | DUFF Michael | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 6 | YE Aaron | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | TABANCAY Cole | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | DESAI Arthav | D D V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 9 | WONG Alexander | V D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 10 | LEE Hubert | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | PARK Jayden | V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | YOON Jacob | V V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 13 | LI Jason | V V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | FAN Yuen | V D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 14 | SUN alan | V V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 16 | ZHENG Matt | V V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 17 | LEI Isaac | V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 18 | YANG Collin | V V D D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 19 | LAD Anish | D V D D V V | D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
| 20 | CHEN Donovan | D V V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | ALLEVATO Luigi | V D D V D V | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 22 | CHOI Theo | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 23 | WOO Slade | D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 24 | BURKHART Camden | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | VAN CLEVE Isaac | D D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | ZHU Mason | V D V D D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 27 | YANG QuanHao | D V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 28 | QIAO Jason | D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 29 | WEN Evan | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | HE Kyle | D D V D D | V | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 31 | JIAO Lawrence | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | DAUM Billy | D D D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 33 | SHETTY Vikram | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 34 | CONCANNON Jackson | D D D D D V | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 35 | WOO Sawyer | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 36 | MCCANN Mercer | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 37 | FERNANDEZ leo | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 38 | JUNG Diego | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 39 | TAM Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.