Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FU BRANDEN | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 2 | QI Zach | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | CHUNG Evan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 2% |
| 3 | LVOVSKIY Roman | - | - | 3% | 24% | 47% | 25% | |
| 5 | DUFF Michael | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | YE Aaron | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 7 | TABANCAY Cole | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
| 8 | DESAI Arthav | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
| 9 | WONG Alexander | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 10 | LEE Hubert | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | PARK Jayden | - | 1% | 14% | 53% | 30% | 2% | |
| 12 | YOON Jacob | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | LI Jason | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 14 | FAN Yuen | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | SUN alan | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ZHENG Matt | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | LEI Isaac | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 18 | YANG Collin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 47% | 44% | |
| 19 | LAD Anish | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 20 | CHEN Donovan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ALLEVATO Luigi | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 22 | CHOI Theo | 6% | 33% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | WOO Slade | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 24 | BURKHART Camden | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | VAN CLEVE Isaac | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ZHU Mason | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 4% |
| 27 | YANG QuanHao | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 28 | QIAO Jason | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | WEN Evan | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | HE Kyle | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | JIAO Lawrence | 1% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | DAUM Billy | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | SHETTY Vikram | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | CONCANNON Jackson | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | WOO Sawyer | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | MCCANN Mercer | 18% | 52% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | FERNANDEZ leo | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | JUNG Diego | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | TAM Ethan | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.