Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZOU Ella | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | HSU Kaylin | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | CHOI Kailyn | D V V V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | XIE Su | V V D D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 5 | PEDERSEN Haley | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 6 | LEVESQUE Brielle | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | VO Bao-Vy | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | DUAN Sophie | D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | SAIFEE Lamya | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | KIM Sydney | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | LIU Samantha | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | POEI Lauren | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | DESAI Esha | V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 14 | YONG Rosalind | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | ZHANG Ivy | D V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | FANG Kelervia | V D D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | HOBSON Ava | D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | V V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 19 | WYNN Kylie | D D V V V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 20 | KIM Lauren | D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | VILLARAMA Kara | V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | ZONG Melody | V D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | MONAT Jennifer | D V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | CHANG Janelle | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 25 | FAN Sophia | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 26 | SAH Madeleine | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | TANG Tang | D V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | HUGHES Liv | V D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 29 | HAN Gian | D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 30 | LAY Apollonia | D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | GUO Audrey | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | D D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 33 | LUCAS Ava | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 35 | GUTIERREZ Gia | V D D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 36 | IDANAWANG Madison | V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 37 | LI Chelsea | D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | IDANAWANG Allison | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 39 | CHEN Chelsea | D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 40 | BHANGOO Paloma | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 41 | XI Sophia | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 42 | BUI Aubrie | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.