Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Carol | - | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% |
2 | DENG Melissa | - | - | - | - | 14% | 85% | |
3 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 46% | 20% |
5 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 39% |
6 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
7 | LI Savannah | - | - | - | 14% | 44% | 35% | 6% |
8 | EYER Brooke | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 41% | 11% |
9 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
10 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
11 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% | |
12 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
13 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 41% | 5% |
14 | PARK Zena | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
15 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
16 | FENG Audrey | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
17 | LI Joy | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
18 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
19 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 46% |
20 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
21 | XIE Lillian | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 52% | 31% |
22 | NWODO Naila | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
23 | BYK Karalina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
24 | PAN Yiran | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 1% |
25 | YANG Hanli | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% | |
27 | YIN Chloe | - | - | 4% | 24% | 53% | 18% | |
28 | LAI Miranda | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
29 | WANG Dina C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
30 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
31 | LEE Jeemin | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
32 | MAGALLANES GABRIELA | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
33 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
34 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
35 | CHAN Jolene | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
36 | BAULIN Zoya | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 1% | |
37 | WATSON Evelyn | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
38 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 2% | 31% | 46% | 19% | 2% |
39 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 3% |
40 | CHUNG Stella | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
41 | BO Iris | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 1% |
42 | TELEB Farida | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
43 | YUAN Aiting | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
44 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
45 | LEO Jenna | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
46 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
47 | LI Christina | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | - |
48 | SHEN Gloria | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
49 | LIN Yunong | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 36% | 8% |
50 | LI Alice | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
51 | YU Sophie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
52 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
53 | ZHANG Selina | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
54 | YANG Olivia | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
55 | FEDER Acadia | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | MALIK Manha | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | - |
57 | RAFFAELE Nancy | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | COLE Sofia | 2% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 7% | - | |
59 | WANG Joann | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
60 | SMOLICH Emily | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | CHO Olivia | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
62 | KIM Sophia | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
63 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 2% |
64 | CHOI Cara | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
65 | SINGH Evangelina | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 1% |
66 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 45% | 17% |
67 | BRADSHAW Tamira | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | < 1% | - |
68 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 3% | 23% | 65% | 9% | |
69 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
70 | ZHU Ella | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
71 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 9% |
72 | CAO Kayla | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
73 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 8% |
74 | DINAR Julia | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 10% | |
76 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
77 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 14% | 44% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
78 | XING Melly | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
79 | PARK Hannah | 2% | 15% | 41% | 37% | 6% | - | |
80 | LI Junhan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
81 | LUO lucy | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
82 | DONG Iris | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 35% | 9% |
83 | REILLY Carys | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
85 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 1% | - | |
86 | HUANG Emma | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
87 | ZHENG Annalyn | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
87 | WU Gloria | 7% | 39% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
89 | LI Doreen | 9% | 43% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
90 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 6% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
91 | HAFEZ Sahar | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
92 | KUANG Bella | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
93 | HO Peyton | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
94 | YOUM Amelia | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
95 | DUVVA Sanika | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
95 | KHETPAL Aalia | 4% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
97 | SUN Erin | 17% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
98 | SHUI Zola | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
99 | GOITIA Genevieve | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
100 | HOU Xu | - | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - |
101 | PHAN Logan | 3% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
102 | HEMPHILL Mia | 5% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
103 | MUNOZ Isabella | 12% | 42% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - |
104 | CHEN Emma | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
105 | VO Evelyn | 16% | 41% | 34% | 9% | - | - | |
106 | LIU Sophia | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
107 | CAPPIELLO Francesca | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
108 | ZHU Alivia | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
109 | KIM Natalie | 2% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
110 | ZUNIGA Sol Alejandra Flores | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
111 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
112 | LU Zoe | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
113 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
114 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 24% | 46% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
115 | WANG Allyson | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
115 | HINDMAN Grace | 29% | 48% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - |
117 | FENG Claire | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
118 | HUANG Gabrielle | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
119 | GENG Emma | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
120 | BENTLEY Amelia | 32% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
121 | VENZON Makena Jane | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
122 | BALIN Julia | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 8% | - | |
123 | LIU Joanna | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
124 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
124 | FAN Melody | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
126 | WU Lorena | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% | - |
127 | DONG Katelyn | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
128 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
129 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
130 | KEVREKIDIS Domnike | 31% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
131 | PAK Sophie | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
132 | JAIN Dia | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
133 | SOMAN Indraa | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
134 | CHIN Riley | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
135 | GANESH Vanshi | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
136 | GOEL Saanvi | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.