The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 2 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | LI Richard | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 3 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 5 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 8% |
| 6 | PONS Diego | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 7 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 8 | YUE Jackson | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | WU Lucas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 20% |
| 10 | KIM Jonah | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | LAM Nicolas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 11 | YANG Charles | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 13 | WONG Evan | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 14 | CLARK Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 15 | LO Ernest | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | AGRAWAL Niki | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 17 | ONG Nicholas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 18 | MANIKTALA Suvir | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 20 | BI Ryan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 21 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 22 | YEE Colin | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | SEIGEL Duncan | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GORDON William L. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 25 | PARK Andrew | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | WONG Braxton | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHANG Jayden | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | AGARWAL Savya | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LEHTINEN Axel | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | ANDRADE Cedric | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | CHAN Joseph | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Andrew | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LUK Trusten | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | BORG Matthew | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 35 | ZHOU Shawn | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | LEE Christopher | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SLAIN Owen | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHEN Owen | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | GRINER Kevin | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ZHAN Kevin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | KARPMAN Benny | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | DOUGLASS Liam | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 45 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 18% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LIU Yuxuan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 47 | ARCARA Evan | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | HE Ian | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | PETROV Mikhail | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | NGUYEN Ethan | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | BURLINGAME Owen | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | HE Bourne | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Linus | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | HERNANDEZ Jonathan | 47% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.