The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 2 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 3 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
| 3 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 5 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | SHIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 7 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% | |
| 8 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 9 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 11 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 12 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 13 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | CHEN zhuoyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 15 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 16 | CHU Theodore | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 18 | WANG Devin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
| 20 | JAO Aaron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | 1% | |
| 20 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 22 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 23 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 24 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 26 | QIAO James | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | KIM Remington | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | GREENMAN Duke | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | MCLAREN Mason | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | TAMAYO-SARVER Daniel | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | COLLINS Kaden | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | NG Biwon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 7% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | LI Grayson | 100% | 93% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | GUO Woody | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 39 | MA Ryan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | WU Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | DENG Andes | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 44 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 45 | WONG Benjamin | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZHAO Colin | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | KURUGANTI Vivaan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LIU Max | 100% | 92% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | WANG Kyle | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | PALMARES Xavier | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.