The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 2 | LIN ariel | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 3 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 6 | BUCA Nora | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 7 | BURICEA Ada | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 8 | LIN Laura | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 9 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | PACHECO Carys | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 12 | CHI Zoe | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | LEE Emily | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 15 | BLANCO Ariia | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 16 | BI Ziyi | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 28% |
| 18 | XU Jessica | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 19 | ZU Jacqueline | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | BHATT Anisha | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 21 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 22 | YUMIACO Nylah | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | EYUNNI Vibha | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | BUDMAN Ava | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | RASHID Summer | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | KANDALA Aanya | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | SUNG Audrey | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | YU Chloe | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 29 | JAMES Ashley | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | YUEN Elsie | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | YUNG Bethany | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 32 | AIRES Julia | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 33 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 34 | LIN Isabel | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 35 | ZHAO Emma | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 36 | XU Chenyu | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | SUN Karolyn | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SALAZAR Emma | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ALI Zoya | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHENIER Amelia | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | DENEALE Lucia | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.