The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
2 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
3 | PENG Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
3 | YONG Rosalind | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
5 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
6 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
7 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
8 | LUO Miranda | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
9 | VO Bao-Vy | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
10 | LIU Ariana | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
11 | LIU Ziyu | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
12 | NEUMANN Erika | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
13 | THERON Zoe | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
13 | LENK Sophie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
15 | CHANG Lydia | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | GU Chen | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
17 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
18 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
19 | LI Joy | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
20 | XIA Isabella | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | LI Chelsea | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
22 | YU Sophie | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
23 | ZHU Yunyao | 1% | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
24 | ZHOU Joi | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
25 | LEE Zoe E. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
26 | MA Isabelle | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
27 | HSIAO Ariya | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
28 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
29 | SAH Madeleine | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | ARYA Leela | 16% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
31 | FANG Kelervia | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | LI Sophia | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | TAN Shouyin | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
34 | DVOIRIS Maya | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
35 | HSU Rachel | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
36 | CHO Karis | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | JIN Jada Y | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
38 | LI Audrey | 12% | 52% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
39 | JENA Aanvi | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | TAI Taphanie | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | GUTIERREZ Gia | 29% | 47% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
42 | MALIUANAG Aerin | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.