The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 2 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 3 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | GAY Jono | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 5 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | |
| 6 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 7 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% |
| 8 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 9 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 10 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 11 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 12 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 13 | WONG David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 14 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | - | |
| 15 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 16 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 17 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 14% | |
| 18 | ROSS Dash S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 19 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 97% | 66% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | VAN ROY Ray | 100% | 95% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | IYER Neil | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 24 | LUC Linkin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | FAN Hsiao-Kai(Kai) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 26 | GONZALEZ Mark | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | VO Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | LISKOVETS Alec | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 29 | PROCOS Julian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 30 | HO Anson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 31 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | VOSPER James | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | ZHENIROVSKYY Oleksandr | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | ELSAYED Yahia | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | WARD Carter | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | YAYLI Alp | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | NELSON Desmond | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.