Brentwood School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Baron | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 2 | DENISON Declan | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | NAZARIAN Jonah | - | - | 2% | 19% | 56% | 22% | |
| 3 | WANG Kunqi | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 5 | STAFFORD Bryan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 6 | GADHVI Darius | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 7 | JONES Rodney | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | CHARETTE Matthew | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 9 | SCHROEDER Dylan | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 22% |
| 10 | LEE Royce | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 11 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 32% | 5% | |
| 12 | CHARETTE Alex | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 13 | WOO Lucas | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | GAINSLEY Isaac | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | KE Jackson | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 17 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 18 | PAEK Marcus | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | DAI Markenever | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | WELLS William | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 21 | GRAHAM Jacob | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | BYRNE Quinlan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | BELLASARIAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 24 | SAUTER Luke | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SCHERZAY Ian | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 26 | PAINTER Noah | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
| 27 | BAKER Livingston Xander | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | KIM Tristan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 28 | LEE Mason | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | POGORZELSKI Nico | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 31 | BANGAYAN Anthony | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | DILORENZO Peter | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | ISAACS Atticus | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | CAMP Ryder | 1% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | BECK Eli | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 36 | KNIGHT Liam | 5% | 46% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | SANDOVAL CUDE Maxwell | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 38 | CLARKE Luca | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KNIGHT Rollan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 40 | BISSADA Matthew | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | ALEXANDER Allen | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 26% | 1% | |
| 42 | YANAI Charlie | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 43 | CALDWELL Sean | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | KAMRAS Ryan | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | MALLMAN Calvin | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 46 | ARNALL Laszlo | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 47 | GONZALEZ Elias | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | LY Richard | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 49 | DAI MIKENEVER | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | YOUNG Trevor | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | BENITEZ Kevin | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 52 | BLOOM Benjamin | - | 8% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
| 53 | ZAPATA Matthew | 8% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | ORLIN Edward | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 55 | CHEN Alexander | 32% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | ARIAS CALIX Franklin | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 57 | BIHLMEIER Gavin | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 58 | RAWLINSON Cameron | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | MARCUS Noah | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 60 | SHAPIRO Benjamin | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | TORRES A Leonardo | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | CRYSTAL Cole | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | XIA Qingchen | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 64 | DOMINGUEZ Abram | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.